For some reason to comment box wont work for me so I am posting here to answer Citizen’s comment.Thanks for the posting. Now I get it. You are looking at this from the standpoint that the Business Did NOT offer these services to ANYONE so therefore should not be forced to offer them to gays or any other person. If that is the case you are ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. But the Business did and still does offer Civil ceremonies and that is what I am referring to and why all the examples were listed in my previous post.  click here and scroll towards the bottm of the page. http://www.timbercreekbb.com/weddings.htm. You can also see where they added the No Civil UNIONS as if thats different from a Civil Ceremony.And the turmoil could have been avoided entirely had it not been for Mr. Walden’s own comments.Quote”The co-owner of the Timber Creek B&B, Jim Walder, also wrote e-mails to Wathen citing various biblical verses and denouncing homosexuality as “wrong and unnatural,” adding that “we will never host same-sex weddings even if they become legal in Illinois.””If that is discrimination, I guess we unfortunately discriminate,” Walder wrote in correspondence provided to the Paxton Record by Wathen.”  END QUOTEAs for a lawsuit for money I agree “gimme a break”. But I do think it is fair and sometimes necessary to file a complaint and try to resolve the Issue IF it can be resolved.Again thanx for taking the time to post. Your viewpoint is appreciated. Take care